Vision · Technology
Implement, don't reinvent
Countries that industrialised first paid for every mistake along the way. We can read their receipts and skip the bill.
The advantage of going second
Almost everything Zimbabwe needs in the next decade already exists and already works somewhere else. Solar hardware, irrigation control, cold chain, payment systems, engineering software. None of it needs to be invented again.
That is a genuine advantage, not a consolation prize. Going second means the expensive experiments have already been run and published. Our job is selection and implementation: pick what works, adapt it to local constraints, and get it running.
The thing that actually has to be transferred
Imported technology without imported skill turns into scrap. I have seen equipment sitting unused because the one person who understood it left. So the thing worth transferring is not the machine, it is the ability to run, repair and eventually design the machine.
That is the real reason I publish what I learn. Every video and every project is one more small piece of a skill made visible to someone who might need it. It is slow, and it compounds.
The order I would do it in
Copy what is proven
Choose boring, well-documented technology over novel technology. Novelty is a cost you pay in downtime.
Adapt to the real constraint
Dust, heat, unreliable supply, distance from a spare part. A design that ignores these is a design for somewhere else.
Leave the skill behind
If the installation ends and nobody local can maintain it, the project failed on a delay.
Still open
I am looking for engineers already doing this work in Southern Africa. If you have deployed something that survived contact with reality, I want to hear what broke.
Start a conversation